Thursday, October 15, 2020

The Daily Messenger: Don Croft, Orgone, and Me...

The Daily Messenger: Don Croft, Orgone, and Me...:       Don or DB or CBSWORKS or Dorkboy. I answer to them all. Don Croft, Orgone, and Me... by Don Bradley 10-15-20 911 had ...

Saturday, October 10, 2020

Diabetes drug Metformin recalled due to high levels of cancer-causing agent

The diabetes drug Metformin hydrochloride has been recalled because it contains excess levels of a cancer-causing agent, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced this week.

The drug’s manufacturer, Marksans Pharma Limited, has expanded a recall initially announced in June to now include an additional 76 unexpired lots of the medication.

The recalled drugs are marketed as “extended-release tablets” under the brand name Time-Cap Labs, Inc.

The drug helps lower the blood glucose levels of those with type 2 diabetes.

But the recalled product contained an unacceptably high level of N-Nitrosodimethylamine, which is considered a probable human carcinogen.

“Marksans performed N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) testing of unexpired identified marketed lots and observed that NDMA content in some lots is exceeding the acceptable Daily Intake Limit (ADI) of 96ng/day,” the FDA outlined in its announcement.

“Therefore, out of an abundance of caution, an additional 76 lots are being recalled.”

The recall applies to metformin tablets between 500 mg and 750 mg.

The 500 mg tablets are debossed with “101” on one side; the 750 mg tablets are debossed with “102” on one side, the agency said.

The FDA advises users to continue taking the recalled tablets until a medical professional provides a replacement or alternative treatment option.

“It could be dangerous for patients with type 2 diabetes to stop taking their metformin without first talking to their health care professional,” the FDA said in a statement.

Consumers “should contact their physician or healthcare provider if they have experienced any problems that may be related to taking or using this drug product.”

 

Monday, October 5, 2020

Socialist-Themed Vegan Meat Company

No Evil Foods, a “revolutionary” food company that champions progressive values, finds itself in a bitter labor dispute.

With products like Comrade Cluck (a plant meat, not actual chicken), No Evil Foods has had success casting itself as a “revolutionary” food company that embodies progressive values.

But the company is learning marketing progressive ideas is easier than implementing socialist-style economics.

For months, company leaders have been resisting a unionization effort by workers at their Weaverville, North Carolina plant.

“I sincerely believe that right now a union would be a terrible thing for you and for No Evil Foods,” Mike Woliansky, the co-founder and CEO of No Evil Foods, told his employees earlier this year. “You could get the same thing you currently have. You could get less than you currently have. I don’t think you need a union voice here.”

Woliansky’s words apparently had an impact.

The unionization effort at No Evil Foods, a vegan foods brand whose foods can be found in more than 5,500 retail stores (including Whole Foods), lost. On Feb. 13 employees voted 43-15 against unionizing. But the battle wasn’t over.

Two of the union organizers were later fired, allegedly for violating social distancing and dress policies.

Earlier this month, VICE News reported that the National Labor Relations Board issued a federal complaint saying the claim that the employees were unlawfully terminated had merit, saying No Evil Foods fired the workers because they "assisted a union" and "circulat[ed] a petition seeking hazard pay...for the purposes of mutual aid and protection."

No Evil Foods denied the firings were retaliatory. Workers disagreed, saying the company was not truly progressive.

“They’re pretending they’re allies of leftist causes,” Jon Reynolds, an ex-employee of No Evil Foods who was one of the fired workers, told Jacobin.

It’s possible No Evil Foods employees are right and the revolutionary themes are simply a marketing ploy intended to attract progressive customers. On the other hand, another scenario is possible: Mike Woliansky and fellow No Evil Foods co-founder Sadrah Schadel are deeply progressive but also self-interested humans trying to make a business succeed.

It wouldn’t be the first time economic reality collided with progressive values. Last year Vox Media was forced to cut 200 bloggers at SB Nation after California passed Assembly Bill 5, legislation that forced numerous industries to change the status of workers from freelancers to actual employees.

Some astute observers pointed out that the firings came just a few months after Vox, a progressive media brand, had championed AB5 as a “victory for workers everywhere.”

A similar scenario could be at play at No Evil Foods. Woliansky might be someone who is progressive but also realizes unionization could cause serious problems for both his company and workers.

While firing workers in retaliation for organizing is indeed against the law—the 1935 National Labor Relations Act makes it unlawful for employers to retaliate against workers attempting to form unions—there is nothing wrong with attempting to persuade workers that forming a union could harm both the company and their own interests.

One of the ways unions hurt labor is they actually decrease overall wages. Economists have long pointed out that wages are tied to productivity.

As Milton Friedman has observed, in a free market wage growth comes from increased productivity and greater capital investment. Artificially raised wages—either by labor unions or minimum wage—can only come at the expense of other workers who find their opportunities reduced.

“When unions get higher wages for their members by restricting entry into an occupation, those higher wages are at the expense of other workers who find their opportunities reduced,” Friedman explained.

But reduced employment is not the only cost. As economist George Reisman has observed, labor unions decrease wages because they decrease productivity.

“From the perspective of most of those lucky enough to keep their jobs, the most serious consequence of the unions is the holding down or outright reduction of the productivity of labor. With few exceptions, the labor unions openly combat the rise in the productivity of labor. They do so virtually as a matter of principle. They oppose the introduction of labor-saving machinery on the grounds that it causes unemployment. They oppose competition among workers. As Henry Hazlitt pointed out, they force employers to tolerate featherbedding practices, such as the classic requirement that firemen, whose function was to shovel coal on steam locomotives, be retained on diesel locomotives. They impose make-work schemes, such as requiring that pipe delivered to construction sites with screw thread already on it, have its ends cut off and new screw thread cut on the site. They impose narrow work classifications, and require that specialists be employed at a day’s pay to perform work that others could easily do — for example, requiring the employment of a plasterer to repair the incidental damage done to a wall by an electrician, which the electrician himself could easily repair.

To anyone who understands the role of the productivity of labor in raising real wages, it should be obvious that the unions’ policy of combating the rise in the productivity of labor renders them in fact a leading enemy of the rise in real wages. However radical this conclusion may seem, however much at odds it is with the prevailing view of the unions as the leading source of the rise in real wages over the last hundred and fifty years or more, the fact is that in combating the rise in the productivity of labor, the unions actively combat the rise in real wages!”

Are Woliansky and Schadel familiar with the economic theories of Friedman and Reisman? Perhaps not.

But as business owners they likely are keenly aware that raising wages without increasing productivity would result in a loss of workers, less production, and less capital investment.

The Marxist theory of labor rejects all of this, of course. In his seminal work Capital (1867), Marx explained his theory: a commodity’s value can be measured simply by breaking down the number of hours it takes to produce.

If it takes twice as long to produce an iPhone as an Apple Watch, then the iPhone is twice as valuable as the Apple Watch. Hence, the competitive price of an iPhone will be twice that of the Apple Watch, in the long run, regardless of the physical inputs required.

Marx’s labor theory of value was debunked more than a century ago, of course. Yet his ideas live on.

It’s unclear if the leaders of No Evil Foods or their workers would call themselves Marxists, but the showdown has all the marks of the endless struggle Marx saw between the bourgeois and the proletariat.

Unfortunately for the owners of No Evil Foods, they're learning the hard way that socialist principles are as problematic in practice as they are in theory.


 

Saturday, September 5, 2020

List of corporations that use tissue from aborted babies in their products

 

(Ethan A. Huff)

Every time you purchase mass-produced processed “food” from the likes of Kraft, Pepsi Co, or Nestle, you’re choosing, whether you realize it or not, to feed your family not only genetically engineered poisons and chemical additives, but also various flavoring agents manufactured using the tissue of aborted human babies.

It’s true: A company based out of California, known as Senomyx, is in the business of using aborted embryonic cells to test fake flavoring chemicals, both savory and sweet, which are then added to things like soft drinks, candy and cookies. And Senomyx has admittedly partnered with a number of major food manufacturers to lace its cannibalistic additives into all sorts of factory foods scarfed down by millions of American consumers every single day.

Known as “HEK-293,” the aborted human fetal cell line used by Senomyx is manipulated to evaluate how the human palate will react to synthetic flavors used in the production of processed foods. Since most processed foods on the market today are hardly food to begin with, and typically lack any real flavor or appeal on their own, chemical companies like Senomyx are hired to develop artificial ones (which are often deceptively labeled as “natural flavors”) in order to make them taste like real food.

But because these ingredients can be legally disguised with vague descriptors like “artificial flavors” and even “natural flavors,” most consumers have no idea that these additives, in some cases, are actually made using the cell tissue of unborn babies that were murdered through abortion. It’s sickening but true, and people must learn the truth in order to avoid partaking in whatEndAllDisease.comsays amounts to a satanic ritual.

“What they don’t tell the public is that they are using HEK 293 — human embryonic kidney cells taken from an elective-ly aborted babies to produce those receptors,” Debi Vinnedge of the pro-life group Children of God for Life said about the ugly truth of the flavoring chemical industry. “They could have easily chosen animal, insect, or other morally obtained human cells expressing the G protein for taste receptors.”

Vaccines, “beauty products” loaded with chemicals made from unborn babies murdered via legalized genocide

Processed food isn’t the only hidden source of additives made using aborted human fetal tissue — many so-called “beauty products” and vaccines are also loaded with aborted baby tissue-derived additives. According toEndAllDisease.com, Neocutis “beauty” products and anti-wrinkle creams are made from aborted male baby cells collected after a 14-week gestation period.

Many vaccines, including Merck & Co.’s MMR II vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella, as well as ProQuad (Merck), Varivax (Merck), Pentacel (Sanofi Pasteur) and Havrix (GlaxoSmithKline), also contain derivatives of aborted human babies.

The following list outlines processed “food” products, vaccines and “beauty products” known to contain ingredients derived from aborted human babies (and there are likely many more; your best bet is to avoid all processed foods in general):

PEPSI BEVERAGES:…• All Pepsi soft drinks…• Sierra Mist soft drinks…• Mountain Dew soft drinks…• Mug root beer and other soft drinks…• No Fear beverages…• Ocean Spray beverages…• Seattle’s Best Coffee…• Tazo beverages…• AMP Energy beverages…• Aquafina water…• Aquafina flavored beverages…• DoubleShot energy beverages…• Frappuccino beverages…• Lipton tea and other beverages…• Propel beverages…• SoBe beverages…• Gatorade beverages…• Fiesta Miranda beverages…• Tropicana juices and beverages

NESTLE PRODUCTS:…• All coffee creamers…• Maggi Brand instant soups, bouillon cubes, ketchups, sauces, seasoning, instant noodles

KRAFT – CADBURY ADAMS PRODUCTS:…• Black Jack chewing gum…• Bubbaloo bubble gum…• Bubblicious bubble gum…• Chiclets…• Clorets…• Dentyne…• Freshen Up Gum…• Sour Cherry Gum (Limited)…• Sour Apple Gum (Limited)…• Stride…• Trident

CADBURY ADAMS CANDIES:…• Sour Cherry Blasters…• Fruit Mania…• Bassett’s Liquorice All sorts…• Maynards Wine Gum…• Swedish Fish…• Swedish Berries…• Juicy Squirts…• Original Gummies…• Fuzzy Peach…• Sour Chillers…• Sour Patch Kids…• Mini Fruit Gums…• Certs breath mints…• Halls Cough Drops

NEOCUTIS “BEAUTY” PRODUCTS:

Neocutis uses aborted male baby cells after a 14-week gestation period in their anti-wrinkle creams. The following creams they sell contain aborted fetal cells, but we need to boycott all their products….• Bio-Gel Prevedem Journee…• Bio-Serum Lumiere…• Bio Restorative Skin Cream

VACCINES:…• MMR II (Merck)…• ProQuad (MMR + Chickenpox — Merck)…• Varivax (Chickenpox — Merck)…• Pentacel (Polio + DTaP + HiB — Sanofi Pasteur)…• Vaqta (Hepatitis-A — Merck)…• Havrix (Hepatitis-A — Glaxo SmithKline)…• Twinrix (Hepatitis-A and B combo — Glaxo)…• Zostavax (Shingles — Merck)…• Imovax (Rabies — Sanofi Pasteur)

OTHER MEDICINES:…• Pulmozyme (Cystic Fibrosis — Genetech)…• Enbrel (Rheumatoid Arthritis — Amgen)